House Litigation Authority on Section 213

Summary#

The resolution would authorize the Speaker of the House to start or join a federal court case on behalf of the House. The case would argue that section 213 of a 2026 appropriations act violates the 27th Amendment. The Speaker would have to notify the House and keep it informed. House counsel could hire outside lawyers and experts. If a court found section 213 unconstitutional, the Speaker could total the House’s case-related costs and ask the Senate to repay them.

What it means for you#

The resolution concerns a possible court challenge between parts of Congress. It does not describe a direct change to services or benefits for the public.

Expenses#

The resolution allows spending on outside lawyers and experts but does not state an amount. No publicly available information about actual costs.

Proponents' View#

The resolution’s findings say section 213 provides financial awards to senators and may change their compensation in a way that conflicts with the 27th Amendment.

Opponents' View#

No publicly available information.