Transparency in online political posts

Full Title:
Promoting Authenticity with Influencer Disclaimers Act

Summary#

This bill adds a new rule to the Federal Election Campaign Act that requires political committees to put a paid-by disclaimer on certain online posts. The main change is that when a political committee pays someone to post content on an internet site, app, or other digital platform, that post must clearly say it was paid for by the committee. The goal is to make paid political content on the internet more transparent.

  • Main change: Paid online posts by third parties must state clearly that they were paid for by the political committee that financed them.
  • Where it applies: Internet websites, web applications, and digital applications (broadly covers online and app-based posts).
  • Notification: The committee must tell the person being paid, at the time of payment, that the post must include the disclaimer.
  • Exceptions: No disclaimer is required for content on a committee’s own website, or for posts by a committee’s compensated employee on that employee’s own social media when the only cost is the employee’s paid time—unless the employee’s main job is posting to their own social media.
  • Regulations and timing: The Federal Election Commission (FEC) must write rules by January 1, 2027. The law applies to communications made on or after January 1, 2027, even if the FEC has not finished its rules.

What is unclear: The bill does not give detailed instructions on exact placement, font size, duration, or penalties for missing the disclaimer. It also does not define how to judge an employee’s “principal duties” in practice.

What it means for you#

  • Political committees (campaigns, PACs):

    • Must require a clear “paid for by [committee name]” statement on online posts they pay others to make.
    • Must notify paid posters at the time of payment that the post needs the disclaimer.
    • Must track whether paid work falls under the employee exceptions (for example, whether an employee’s principal duty is posting on their own social accounts).
  • Influencers, contractors, and other paid posters:

    • If you are paid by a political committee to post online, your post will need to include a clear statement that the committee paid for it.
    • You should expect to receive a notification from the paying committee at the time you are paid.
  • Compensated employees of a committee:

    • If you post on your own social media and the only cost is your paid time, you usually do not need the disclaimer.
    • If your main job is to post on your own social accounts, the exception does not apply and your posts must include the disclaimer.
  • Voters and general public:

    • You will likely see more labels on online political content that say it was paid for by a committee. This makes the source of paid political messages clearer.

Expenses#

No publicly available information.

  • Possible costs that could follow from the bill (inferred from the text):
    • Compliance costs for political committees to add disclaimers, update contracts, and track employee roles.
    • Time and legal review to ensure posts meet the “clear and conspicuous” standard.
    • Administrative work for the FEC to write and enforce rules, once required to do so.
  • The bill does not include a fiscal note or specific estimates of spending or fines.

Proponents' View#

  • The bill appears intended to make paid political content online more transparent to viewers.
  • A possible argument for the bill is that clear, consistent disclaimers help users tell when content is paid political communication, which supports informed voting and public discussion.
  • The notification requirement could ensure paid posters know of their disclosure duty before publishing.

Opponents' View#

  • One concern is that the bill leaves key details unclear, such as exact disclosure placement, size, and how to judge whether an employee’s principal duties trigger the exception.
  • The law does not specify penalties or enforcement procedures in this text, so it is unclear how violations would be handled.
  • Another possible trade-off is added administrative and compliance burden for small committees, paid contractors, and employees who must track and apply the rule.
  • Because the law takes effect on January 1, 2027 even if the FEC has not finished rules, there may be uncertainty about how to follow the standard until regulations are published.