Legislative Assembly of Ontario · Committee

Thursday, May 28, 2026

Standing Committee on Government Agencies · Room 151

The official transcript of the meeting, from Hansard, by heading. Ministers, officials and witnesses appear as the transcript names them; committees have no live transcript, so the record appears once the Assembly publishes it.

Meeting ended
9:00 a.m.Official transcript

The Second Vice-Chair (MPP Wayne Gates)

Good morning, everyone. The Standing Committee on Government Agencies will now come to order. As always, all comments by the members and witnesses should go through the Chair.

Official source

Subcommittee reports

9:00 a.m.Official transcript

The Second Vice-Chair (MPP Wayne Gates)

Adoption of the subcommittee reports?

Official source

9:00 a.m.Official transcript

Ms. Laura Smith

I move adoption of the subcommittee report on intended appointments dated Thursday, May 14, 2026, on the order-in-council certificate dated May 8, 2026.

Official source

9:00 a.m.Official transcript

The Second Vice-Chair (MPP Wayne Gates)

Any discussion? Are the members ready to vote? All in favour? Opposed? Carried. We have a subcommittee report dated Thursday, May 21, 2026. Could I please have a motion? Again, go ahead.

Official source

9:00 a.m.Official transcript

Ms. Laura Smith

I move adoption of the subcommittee report on intended appointments dated Thursday, May 21, 2026, on the order-in-council certificate dated May 15, 2026.

Official source

9:00 a.m.Official transcript

The Second Vice-Chair (MPP Wayne Gates)

Any discussion? Go ahead, MPP Gilmour.

Official source

9:00 a.m.Official transcript

MPP Alexa Gilmour

I’m a little unsure if this is the moment for this discussion, but I do want to raise that we are potentially in our last meeting if we rise early, and we have seen a pattern of letting certificates lapse that really should be coming before this committee. Anyone who is serious, as our interviewees are here today, should take the time to come and be properly vetted by this committee. It’s part of our democratic process. So I’m quite concerned with this pattern that we have—that the government has—of allowing committees to lapse. We’re seeing at the moment a pattern of individuals whose experience doesn’t always match the job that they’re seeking, so we don’t, on our side, have a way of knowing why this government has made a decision to appoint them, and it would be really important to have a chance to vet them. What we do see is that they have deep ties to the government. We saw one today, Mr. Diamond, who is not coming before us, who has deep ties to the Conservative Party, and yet we don’t know how his experience matches up and lines up with the Niagara Parks Commission. Yet he’s being appointed and it will just pass and we have no options, no way of ensuring the best for our residents of Ontario. So I’m quite concerned with this pattern, and I would like to see us moving to a pattern of meeting over the summer and of ensuring that no certificate lapses. If people don’t come before the committee—which I’m afraid now we’re going to see more and more people, more and more individuals who don’t have the qualifications deciding to skirt the system and not come before us to explain why they might be the right fit. Because they know that, over and over again, this government—if you say, “I’m busy, I’m sick, I’m away,” and wait 30 days, then you are automatically appointed to high-paying, high-levels-of-responsibility jobs in our province. It’s undemocratic, it is not good for Ontario, and it will be the legacy of this government for years and years to come. These people will be sitting on these committees, on these councils, on these tribunals. We’re already seeing a pattern where these members—Tribunal Watch has talked about the degradation of the tribunal system because people are not experienced and qualified for those jobs. So, Mr. Chair, I hope that we change this pattern of simply approving reports and letting certificates lapse and that, going forward, this committee takes its job far more seriously and ensures that every individual—especially those who have any sort of peculiarities to them. We have a wonderful individual before us who, on paper, seems perfect. We have many other ones who are a bit of a head-scratcher, and I think we need to make sure that they come before the committee.

Official source

9:03 a.m.Official transcript

The Second Vice-Chair (MPP Wayne Gates)

Is there any further discussion? Are the members ready to vote? All those in favour?

Official source

9:03 a.m.Official transcript

The Second Vice-Chair (MPP Wayne Gates)

Yes, that’s what we’re doing. So I’ll do that again: Any further discussion? Are the members ready to vote? All those in favour? Opposed? Carried.

Official source

Mr. Ian McMillan

9:03 a.m.Official transcript

Review of intended appointment, selected by government: Ian McMillan, intended appointee as member, Destination Ontario board of directors.

Official source

9:03 a.m.Official transcript

The Second Vice-Chair (MPP Wayne Gates)

We will now move to the review of the intended appointees. Our first intended appointee today is Ian McMillan, nominated as a member of the Destination Ontario board of directors. You may make an initial statement at your discretion. Following this, there will be questions from the members of the committee. With the questioning, we will start with the government, followed by the official opposition and then the third party, with 10 minutes allocated to each recognized party. Any time you take during your statement, sir, will be deducted from the time allocated to the government.

Official source

9:03 a.m.Official transcript

Mr. Sheref Sabawy

I think they shifted the seatings, but the mikes are still not shifted, so my mike is saying “Steve,” and his mike is saying “Dowie.” So that means the recording will not be matching—

Official source

9:04 a.m.Official transcript

The Second Vice-Chair (MPP Wayne Gates)

My direction here is saying we can get that fixed after, so we’re good.

Official source

9:04 a.m.Official transcript

Mr. Sheref Sabawy

That’s okay. I’m just saying, because the recording will be not matching.

Official source

9:04 a.m.Official transcript

Mr. Ian McMillan

Thank you, Mr. Chair and members of the committee. I have to tell you, it’s certainly an honour to be considered for an appointment to the board of directors of Destination Ontario. Tourism has been my life’s work. I have spent my entire career in this industry, beginning with northern Ontario’s largest attraction—hopefully some of you are familiar with it—called the Agawa Canyon Tour Train. From there, I went on to serve as executive director of both the Algoma regional tourism bureau and the tourism bureau for Sault Ste. Marie. Today, I operate my own consulting company and have worked with organizations such as the Great Lakes cruise coalition—the organization responsible for bringing all of those wonderful ships onto our Great Lakes—and a number of tourism-related businesses across the province and beyond. Over the past eight years, my primary focus has been on the development of the international market opportunities for northern Ontario. That experience has reinforced for me just how important international travel is, not only for the north, but for all of Ontario. International visitors bring new spending into our province, support businesses large and small and help strengthen local economies in every region. To make sure I keep my skill sets current, I constantly engage with the rather youthful staff at our Destination Northern Ontario. To develop content for posts on various social platforms, I make use of the most current research available through Destination Canada’s data collective to make informed and targeted marketing decisions. Our efforts directed at growing international travel to northern Ontario have certainly paid off, as when I started this program in 2018, international tourism receipts to northern Ontario were $7 million. Those grew to $48 million in 2023, and grew again in 2024 to over $81 million. Throughout my career, I’ve had the privilege of serving in a number of leadership roles. I was chair of the Great Lakes cruise coalition during its formative years. I also served as chair of Attractions Ontario and as a board member and committee chair with one of the province’s designated administrative authorities, TICO, which gave me valuable insights into the travel and the travel agency sector. I was also fortunate to serve on the inaugural board of the Tourism Industry Association of Ontario and chaired their first provincial tourism industry conference, an event that continues annually to this day. And most recently, as you know, I completed two terms as a board member and vice-chair of Science North. Other than TICO, all of these boards that I have served on were completely volunteer boards. Closer to home, I continued my volunteerism sitting on the board of our local winter carnival for 10 years and was a Rotarian for 10 years. I made sure to get my municipal commitments in before I got married and had three incredible daughters that took up much of my spare time after that. I have also taught a variety of classes at our Sault College and spent three years as a professor at Algoma University, teaching tourism-related courses in the geography department. When the Ministry of Tourism moved towards creating an arm’s-length tourism marketing organization, I served on several industry committees for what was then called OTMPC, helping provide input on key issues and priorities, and continued that involvement as the organization evolved into what it is now: Destination Ontario. During my time leading Tourism Sault Ste. Marie, our community became the first municipality in northern Ontario, and only the third in the province after Toronto and Ottawa, to introduce what was then called the “destination marketing fee,” now known as “the municipal accommodation tax.” That initiative allowed us to reinvest directly into tourism industry through capital infrastructure, product development and digital innovation, including northern Ontario’s first online reservation system. Being from northern Ontario has given me a deep appreciation for how tourism and our natural environment work hand in hand. Our forests, our waterways, our trails and outdoor experiences are the foundation of industries such as fishing, snowmobiling and adventure tourism that attract visitors from around the world. At the same time, my province-wide involvement has also given me a strong understanding of tourism sectors that may not be as prominent in the north but are critically important to Ontario’s growth overall. Markets such as Toronto, Ottawa and Niagara Falls rely heavily on meetings, conventions, major events, concerts and internationally recognized attractions, such as the Royal Ontario Museum, the Art Gallery of Ontario, Science North and Fort William Historical Park. Politically, through my career, I have remained non-partisan. In municipal and regional tourism roles, I have worked with ministers, MPs and MPPs from all party and political backgrounds. I always believed that remaining neutral allowed me to build productive relationships on advancing tourism and supporting the industry as a whole. So what would I bring to the board of Destination Ontario? I believe I would bring a broad perspective, shaped by decades of experience, in local, regional, provincial, national and now international levels. Those experiences have allowed me to see the tourism industry from many different angles and have given me a strong understanding of how successful boards operate: through collaboration, accountability and shared purpose. Equally important, I understand the responsibility that comes with stewarding taxpayer dollars. Transparency, fiscal responsibility and sound governance are essential to maintaining public trust and ensuring long-term success. There is no question that these are challenging times, particularly in relation to our largest tourism market, the United States. We cannot ignore that market—nor should we—but we must also continue encouraging Ontarians to explore their own province and to support domestic travel, while increasing visitation from across Canada. At the same time, I believe Ontario has tremendous opportunities internationally. We have world-class experiences, natural beauty, vibrant cities and cultural assets that position us to compete globally. Expanding international visitation brings an entirely new spending to Ontario. I’ve always been a glass-half-full person and, while I recognize the challenges ahead, I’m genuinely excited about the future of tourism in Ontario. I believe this province is exceptionally well-positioned to become an internationally recognized destination, and I would be truly honoured to contribute to the vision as a member of the board of Destination Ontario. Thank you, Mr. Chair.

Official source

9:10 a.m.Official transcript

The Second Vice-Chair (MPP Wayne Gates)

Thank you very much for your presentation, sir. We will start the questioning with the government. You have three minutes and 51 seconds. MPP Dowie.

Official source

9:10 a.m.Official transcript

Mr. Andrew Dowie

Mr. McMillan, thank you so much for your opening remarks and for putting your name forward. I’ll concede, I have a bit of an attachment to this; I used to serve on Destination Ontario myself. Your CV is truly tailor-made for this role, so I’m grateful that you put your name forward and that your qualifications have been very, very well laid out. I’m hoping that you can share with the committee further why you believe that you are well suited to meet the expectations of Destination Ontario and the potential that you see for growing, especially within our province, the tourism delivery.

Official source

9:11 a.m.Official transcript

Mr. Ian McMillan

Thank you. Mr. Chair, through you, with the mandate of Destination Ontario to market and promote Ontario as a true destination, I think the skill set that I bring to the table fits quite well. I’ve been involved in the development of marketing plans, the delivery of marketing plans and tactics on a local, regional, provincial and national level, and I just think I have a good understanding of where we have been but, more importantly, really a good global perspective of where we can be and where we’re going. I just think, from a strategic point of view, my skill sets would be well suited to help work with that board and guide Destination Ontario for the future.

Official source

9:12 a.m.Official transcript

Mrs. Michelle Cooper

Thank you for being here, especially in person, which was very nice. Mr. McMillan, your résumé is quite impressive, with a focus on northern Ontario, which is terrific, meets that need. I imagine you will serve that region well. How do you envision contributing to Destination Ontario?

Official source

9:12 a.m.Official transcript

Mr. Ian McMillan

Again, I think I come from a bit of a unique perspective, partly because, as you say, I am from northern Ontario. I always like to remind people when I sit on various boards, whether it was Attractions Ontario or TICO, “You’re Attractions Ontario, not attractions southern Ontario. You’re Travel Industry Council of Ontario, not southern Ontario.” I just think I bring a bit of a yin to the yang of understanding the needs and the wants, because our industry is made up of small and medium-sized businesses. Many, many of them are located in northern Ontario. I just think my understanding of working with the private sector in smaller municipalities augurs well with working with the bigger picture, the Torontos, the Ottawas and the Niagara Fallses. So I think I’d bring that unique perspective to help deliver programs and strategic direction to Destination Ontario.

Official source

9:13 a.m.Official transcript

Mr. Stéphane Sarrazin

Thank you very much for being here. I have to say, I’m quite impressed. I was looking at your LinkedIn profile and now realizing that not half of it is on there, and what you’ve been—and no doubt that you’re passionate about this.

Official source

9:14 a.m.Official transcript

Mr. Stéphane Sarrazin

You’ve been involved since 1982. That’s quite impressive. Maybe you can talk a bit more about your involvement with Science North, what you brought to the table. Maybe talk a little bit more about that.

Official source

9:14 a.m.Official transcript

Mr. Ian McMillan

Sure. I really enjoyed my time with Science North. The board was made up of an interesting dynamic of people from the science background, mining background. What they didn’t have a lot of at the time was a tourism background. First and foremost, we were always reminded by one of your ministers that we are, again, Science North, not science Sudbury. So it was important to try to go out and reach out to communities that were not in the Sudbury area and bring science and STEM to communities right across northern Ontario. So I found it very interesting—and again, my connection is with the tourism industry—to keep reminding Science North that they were many things, one of them being a tourism attraction, and that they could have a really good economic impact.

Official source

9:15 a.m.Official transcript

The Second Vice-Chair (MPP Wayne Gates)

I’m sorry. Time is up. We’ll now move to the official opposition. MPP Gilmour.

Official source

9:15 a.m.Official transcript

MPP Alexa Gilmour

Thank you so much for being before us. I want to begin by saying something that doesn’t often happen in this committee: It’s a genuine, refreshing pleasure to be reviewing an appointment where the qualifications speak for themselves. Chair, Mr. McMillan clearly brings decades of real, hands-on experience to Ontario tourism. Inducted into the Festivals and Events Ontario hall of fame in 2017, recognized with a lifetime achievement award from the Tourism Industry Association of Ontario in 2019—I mean, this is how order-in-council appointments are supposed to work. You are demonstrating that one of the few times and, perhaps, certainly the most obvious time in my entire year of sitting on this committee. So I want to congratulate the government side for bringing this appointment before us. I know that it feels good. You guys are actually saying the same thing we are: What great qualifications; what a great track record. I hope that this feeling kind of moves us towards this more often, because it serves the people of the province well. With that, I did want to ask some substantive questions of the witness—we do always start with some standard questions—and then I’ll move more into the qualifications piece. Are you a member of or have you donated to any political party in the past?

Official source

9:17 a.m.Official transcript

MPP Alexa Gilmour

Thank you. Did anyone suggest that you apply to this appointment?

Official source

9:17 a.m.Official transcript

Mr. Ian McMillan

As you know, I sat on the Science North board. As my term expired, it came up in discussions. I enjoyed my time on TICO, I enjoyed my time on Science North, and I thought I still had more to give, and I just started to explore what potentials were out there related to tourism. I had no desire to find some strange board to sit on. I was made aware that this potentially was available, and I just submitted my résumé and application through the process.

Official source

9:18 a.m.Official transcript

MPP Alexa Gilmour

Well, I hope you continue to enjoy your time on these boards that you sit on and in the ways that you serve. Mr. McMillan, you’ve spent a couple of decades as the executive director of tourism for Sault Ste. Marie, an area I’ve been to many times—it’s absolutely stunning—and before that, as the brand manager for Northern Tourism Marketing Corp., executive director for Algoma Kinniwabi Travel Association. This is an extraordinary depth of northern Ontario experience which I think is one of those spaces that we are always trying to expand. Toronto sees 28 million tourists just to its waterfront alone, but Algoma in the fall is unbelievably stunning, right? One of the questions that I had was around the Auditor General’s 2023 value-for-money audit. It was specifically noted that the marketing dollars may be better directed outside of Ontario, including, at that time, the United States—although things have changed dramatically with our relationships there. I’m just wondering, given your background promoting northern Ontario to a broad audience, what’s your view on how Destination Ontario should be striking that balance between the domestic and the international marketing investments?

Official source

9:20 a.m.Official transcript

Mr. Ian McMillan

Well, not being on the board at the moment and seeing how the decisions are made, it’s a little bit difficult to speak to that. But I will say that what I have seen from a partnership approach with Destination Ontario—because I do work with them. I’m here right now, actually, for Rendez-vous Canada, which is the big international marketplace. So they have been very forthcoming in recognizing that outdoor nature, fresh air, fresh water, the Great Lakes are an important part to your point of the overall promotion of Ontario, and I think there is a nice balance and one of the reasons that Ontario is the biggest destination in Canada, for visitors, is because we have that nice balance. We have the Torontos, we have the Ottawas, we have the Niagara Fallses, but we also have some incredible outdoors and the Great Lakes up in northern Ontario. So I think they have done a good job of managing that perspective and understanding and shifting when shifting is needed to focus on either domestic, US or international travel.

Official source

9:21 a.m.Official transcript

MPP Alexa Gilmour

Destination Ontario recently established this north marketing committee drawing precisely on the regions that you know best, right?

Official source

9:21 a.m.Official transcript

MPP Alexa Gilmour

So I’m wondering what gaps you might see in northern Ontario and how northern Ontario is currently being marketed to travellers, and what you might bring to close those gaps?

Official source

9:21 a.m.Official transcript

Mr. Ian McMillan

It’s funny. I am the person for international market development for northern Ontario, and that’s what my contract is. I get feedback first-hand from tour operators that have come here. In fact, when we leave here, I’m taking 24 tour operators and touring them around northern Ontario for four days. So the standard issues with northern Ontario are size, scope, distance between markets and connectivity, whether it’s WiFi or Internet. Those kinds of things are just general issues. But they’re more than offset by the will and the need for people to come and see nature first-hand. I think that trumps everything. There are some great opportunities. We’ll never have 28 million people in northern Ontario like the waterfront in Toronto. But even if we do several thousands that tour through northern Ontario, the economic impact up into that market is great.

Official source

9:22 a.m.Official transcript

MPP Alexa Gilmour

Yes, it’s significant. Thank you so much. And now you’ve spent, as you just described, a great part of your career building those partnerships with the private sector operators, with the regional tourism organizations and others, and in that Auditor General report, they found that Destination Ontario and the regional tourism organizations have overlapping responsibilities and they haven’t always been in marketing in partnership with each other. So I was wondering how you might use your experience to push the board towards a more genuine collaborative model with the RTOs, rather than something that sort of overlaps but doesn’t always go hand in fist together.

Official source

9:23 a.m.Official transcript

Mr. Ian McMillan

Sure. It’s a good question. I guess what I would do is bring in my anecdotal experience in terms of how the northern RTO, which I think is looked at as one of the more successful RTOs in the province—I think I can bring the approach that we use in northern Ontario and relate it to the rest of the province and see how that fits. But I just know we have a very good, strong track record of partnerships, collaboration and delivery of with programs with RTO 13 and I can speak to that and perhaps the successes can be reflected to some of the other areas.

Official source

9:23 a.m.Official transcript

MPP Alexa Gilmour

We’ve spoken a lot about the north. I’d like to bring us—because, of course, Toronto is part of Ontario—

Official source

9:24 a.m.Official transcript

MPP Alexa Gilmour

—and we’ve got some new legislation. This government is proposing legislation that’s going to allow the province to declare parts of Toronto’s waterfront, including potentially significant portions of the Toronto Islands—in fact, the bill that we’re debating in the House today will give the province the entire Toronto Islands, and the Premier has declared that he’s going to make some of them a special economic zone where the provincial, the municipal laws could be suspended, all in service of expanding Billy Bishop airport. Now, the city officials, the waterfront secretariat and others have warned this plan would have substantial implications for those 28 million tourists, for the residents. Gridlock and transit congestion would lead to a degradation of water quality in the harbour. And Toronto’s waterfront—its parks, its beaches, its public spaces—is one of the province’s signature tourism destinations— Interjection.

Official source

9:25 a.m.Official transcript

The Second Vice-Chair (MPP Wayne Gates)

MPP Smyth—or Smith; sorry. Smyth; Smith.

Official source

9:25 a.m.Official transcript

Ms. Laura Smith

Point of order, Mr. Chair. If we could keep the questions aligned with the qualifications of the candidate and this particular role, please.

Official source

9:25 a.m.Official transcript

The Second Vice-Chair (MPP Wayne Gates)

I appreciate that. Try to keep your question in line.

Official source

9:25 a.m.Official transcript

MPP Alexa Gilmour

I believe talking about the 28 million tourists at Toronto’s waterfront is in line. I’m surprised—shocked, just amazed—that my colleague MPP Smith is bringing that question yet again. Back to the beaches, the parks, the public spaces: This is one of the province’s tourist assets. As someone who has spent a career understanding what draws visitors and what drives them away, what is your assessment of the tourism risk if public waterfront spaces are displaced in the name of an airport expansion, and what do you see as the board’s role in that?

Official source

9:26 a.m.Official transcript

Mr. Ian McMillan

I appreciate your question. I would just say that looking at the mandate of Destination Ontario, it’s a marketing organization, and I think any policy decisions as you are referring to are kind of—

Official source

9:26 a.m.Official transcript

Mr. Ian McMillan

—at the higher level, at your folks’ level. I think as a marketing organization, we would deal with what we have in terms of an asset, whatever that looks like or whatever it becomes. The policy and the decision-making are at a different level, and I don’t think we would deal with that.

Official source

9:26 a.m.Official transcript

MPP Alexa Gilmour

Would it be harder to market a waterfront destination that has jets coming by every two minutes?

Official source

9:26 a.m.Official transcript

Mr. Ian McMillan

Again, I’m not qualified to make that type of decision. I would market what I was handed—that kind of thing.

Official source

9:26 a.m.Official transcript

MPP Alexa Gilmour

I appreciate that. What do you see as the biggest opportunity or challenges for Ontario tourism in this present moment, and how might you respond as a member?

Official source

9:27 a.m.Official transcript

Mr. Ian McMillan

As we know, generally speaking—not necessarily on behalf of the board of Destination Ontario, but just the tourism industry in general—one of the obvious challenges is our relationship with our neighbours to the south, and how that will play out and what impact it has on travelling both directions. But I think as one door closes, one door opens. I think there’s an opportunity for Ontarians to travel within Ontario—

Official source

9:27 a.m.Official transcript

The Second Vice-Chair (MPP Wayne Gates)

Time’s up. Thank you, MPP Gilmour. We’ll move on to—I’ll try to get this one right—MPP Smyth.

Official source

9:27 a.m.Official transcript

MPP Stephanie Smyth

Lovely to meet you today, and thank you for coming here. Going over your vast experience, especially in the north, it is great to see someone with such experience looking to take on this new role, which is really exciting. I am very excited myself to take the canyon tour train, maybe in the fall. It’s just so incredible.

Official source

9:28 a.m.Official transcript

MPP Stephanie Smyth

And I have to admit: I’m an Ontarian, obviously, but the first time I did the drive from Wawa to Sault Ste. Marie—

Official source

9:28 a.m.Official transcript

MPP Stephanie Smyth

Like, it’s spectacular. I’d like to do my own tourism commercial for that. I had no idea. We all spend time—I do—in the north, but more up Highway 11, so that was an absolute treat, and Sault Ste. Marie, that region of the north, is phenomenal. Getting to your experience, which is very vast and wonderful to see: As we look for this appointment for you, I wanted to just ask, when we’re talking about the north—and you’re such an expert there—for me it was a surprise, what was going on in Sault Ste. Marie and the gorgeousness of the province, having seen it first-hand in that way for the first time. What do you see, when it comes to the north now having this new position—potentially, likely—as the biggest on-tap tourism opportunity maybe in the north or in Ontario right now?

Official source

9:29 a.m.Official transcript

Mr. Ian McMillan

Again, I would have to do a bit of a deeper dive to better understand where this board sits in terms of making decisions, which I’m not privy to at the moment. But I think, again—I sound like a broken record—the opportunity is people are now looking at reconnecting with nature, outdoors, a safe destination, clean water, fresh air: all of those pieces that we have in little pockets in southern Ontario, but in large quantities in northern Ontario. I think there’s a great opportunity. Toronto is going to be where all international travel comes into the province, but it’s our role to try and spread that business around the province—or at least my role—and so I see a great opportunity for that, of using that natural, as you say, beautiful setting, and helping people travel around the province.

Official source

9:30 a.m.Official transcript

MPP Stephanie Smyth

I know—and you can confirm—do you think that tourism operators are struggling right now with staffing shortages and rising costs and affordability pressures? You can confirm or conflict with what I just said in that statement, but what role do you think Destination Ontario could play in supporting local businesses beyond simply attracting visitors?

Official source

9:30 a.m.Official transcript

Mr. Ian McMillan

Again, I’m not completely familiar—the general mandate, I understand, of Destination Ontario is marketing and delivering visitors. I think that’s their primary role. In my role currently I do work very directly with small operators in terms of training and upgrading and teaching them, if they’re interested in the international markets, so that they can expand their business into the shoulder seasons. I do that first-hand currently right now, so I do have that kind of skill set. I’m not sure—again, because I’m not really familiar with the workings currently of the board; I’m not on the board—how that would fit with that board, with the mandate of marketing, mainly.

Official source

9:31 a.m.Official transcript

MPP Stephanie Smyth

Right. I think some smaller, rural communities might feel provincial tourism dollars and promotions are concentrated around larger urban centres. Working in the north, would you agree with that statement over the years?

Official source

9:31 a.m.Official transcript

Mr. Ian McMillan

I think it’s a fair statement that every destination would love to have more money to market and promote their destination. I think you would get that across the board, period. I think the MAT tax has given the opportunity for smaller and rural communities to generate funds to start doing marketing and product development. I think that has been a positive step, and I see bigger activities as a result of doing that. So there are challenges, but I think good things are happening.

Official source

9:31 a.m.Official transcript

MPP Stephanie Smyth

That’s good to hear. Just going back to Toronto right now and talking about waterfront development decisions that are currently being debated as we look at the House right now, as my colleague mentioned, Bill 110 and development—not to get out of line here—do you think tourism development should ever come at the expense of local community consultation and public access?

Official source

9:32 a.m.Official transcript

Mr. Ian McMillan

Again, I can’t relate to the board of Destination Ontario because I’m not privy to that yet. But I think just in general terms, all through my career, whether it was on a local or a municipal level, transparency and communication are important in whatever we do in tourism. You’re never going to necessarily make everyone happy, but I think as long as you have the dialogue and the communication and the transparency, it augurs well for whatever you decide on at the end of the day.

Official source

9:32 a.m.Official transcript

MPP Stephanie Smyth

Should you join the board, what responsibility then do you think that Destination Ontario would have to ensure that tourism growth is actually sustainable and community-driven and not mandated by government, driven that way?

Official source

9:32 a.m.Official transcript

Mr. Ian McMillan

Again, at the risk of sounding like a broken record, I’m not familiar—because I’m not on the board—with the process of how they make their decisions. But I would have to believe that any discussion and decision-making along that line would follow in that, in understanding whatever decision is made and how it will impact on municipalities or private sector, those kinds of things.

Official source

9:33 a.m.Official transcript

MPP Stephanie Smyth

Do you think that you would see yourself, as a board member, considering protections for Ontario’s waterfronts, being preserved and accessible for future generations? Just the protection of them, would that be something that you would always consider? I’m sure working in the north you’ve considered the beautiful spaces that you have, and you want to keep those for everyone, for generations to come.

Official source

9:33 a.m.Official transcript

Mr. Ian McMillan

I certainly have my own personal opinions on all of that, but again, with Destination Ontario being generally a marketing-mandated board, I don’t know whether that falls under the purview of their process and their decision-making. It’s more around the marketing efforts than anything.

Official source

9:33 a.m.Official transcript

MPP Stephanie Smyth

Do you think that communities themselves should have a say—you’ve worked with smaller municipalities throughout your career as well—in major tourism challenges and things to come or ideas or potential developments?

Official source

9:34 a.m.Official transcript

Mr. Ian McMillan

I think there’s a process in place, MPP, related to the RTOs. I think there is a process in place holistically in Ontario where it starts from the private sector and can have a pipeline to their regional DMO, a pipeline up to the Ontario level. I think there is a mechanism in place to have that conversation. How well it works, again, I’m not privy to at this level yet until I get on the board. But I think it’s there to have.

Official source

9:34 a.m.Official transcript

MPP Stephanie Smyth

Maybe you can help answer this question for me, because I’m not exactly sure how this would work. But let’s take Niagara Falls as an example, and let’s take a Ferris wheel at Niagara Falls as an example. At first blush, I’m thinking out in my mind, “What a fantastic way to see Niagara Falls, on a Ferris wheel, potentially.” You think of the London Eye in the UK. But then you think, “Okay, what is this going to do? Is this going to be a blight? Is this going to cause more of a block, a detriment, to seeing Niagara Falls?” That becomes an issue. How would Destination Ontario deal with that kind of situation if there was a great divide over such a tourism idea?

Official source

9:35 a.m.Official transcript

Mr. Ian McMillan

Again, understanding that the mandate of Destination Ontario is primarily a marketing mandate to drive visitation, I don’t believe it’s the responsibility of them to make that determination. I think that determination would be made on a local level—

Official source

9:35 a.m.Official transcript

Ms. Laura Smith

If we could just keep the questioning in line with his particular role with Science North and his application to his position, that would be better.

Official source

9:35 a.m.Official transcript

The Chair (Ms. Mary-Margaret McMahon)

Thank you. Basically, a one-minute warning.

Official source

9:35 a.m.Official transcript

Mr. Ian McMillan

Not at all, no. As you can read, while I was based in the north, my experience is really province-wide and even Canada-wide, so I think I bring a much broader perspective than just northern Ontario. That’s always kind of my background, but no. I’ve worked with Niagara Falls Tourism, Toronto tourism, Ottawa Tourism. To this day, I’m at, as I said, Rendez-vous Canada down at the convention centre here in Toronto for the past three days, where we have 500 tour operators from around the world and a thousand tourism people from across Canada. We’re selling Canada down to Ontario and that kind of thing.

Official source

9:36 a.m.Official transcript

MPP Stephanie Smyth

At the risk of being a broken record, if you get on the board with your incredible experience, what’s the first thing you would do on Destination Ontario? I know you haven’t sat on the board yet, but you have worked with people on it. You know people. You might have an idea how it works. What’s one thing you’d want to do immediately to have an impact?

Official source

9:36 a.m.Official transcript

Mr. Ian McMillan

You know what? Not to be dodgy, but my honest answer would be to, for the first while, listen, to better understand, because it’s better to understand than just speak out about things you don’t know about. So, listen, learn and then see where I can contribute.

Official source

9:37 a.m.Official transcript

The Chair (Ms. Mary-Margaret McMahon)

Thank you very much, Ian. Sorry I missed your story, but I’m sure I will hear about it. I had to debate in the House. Thank you very much for your time today and for your willingness to serve. We will now go on to our next candidate. You are welcome to stay and eavesdrop and then hear whether you are selected or not at the end, or you can leave us, depart and enjoy the sunshine. It’s up to you.

Official source

9:37 a.m.Official transcript

Mr. Ian McMillan

I would love to stay, but as I was saying, Madam Chair, I’m working at Rendez-vous Canada down at the convention centre. I have appointments in dealing with tour operators for the rest of the day, so I will take leave. I’m sure I’ll hear from somebody at some point.

Official source

9:37 a.m.Official transcript

The Chair (Ms. Mary-Margaret McMahon)

Okay. Well, best of luck, and thank you very much.

Official source

Mr. Harouna Saley Sidibé

9:37 a.m.Official transcript

Review of intended appointment, selected by official opposition: Harouna Saley Sidibé, intended appointee as member, Social Benefits Tribunal.

Official source