Post-Secondary Education Financial Assistance for Persons with Disabilities Act

Summary#

Bill C-217, An Act to amend the Canada Student Financial Assistance Act and the Income Tax Act, would amend those two Acts. Its stated goal is to improve access to post-secondary education for Canadians with disabilities. The supplied material does not give the bill’s current status, so these are proposed changes, not provisions known to be in force.

  • The Minister would have to pay tuition fees to a designated educational institution for an enrolled individual who meets the bill’s disability-related tax-law condition and any conditions set by regulation.
  • The payment would count as a grant to the individual, even though it would be paid to the institution.
  • The bill would authorize regulations setting conditions that must be met before payment.
  • It would add the payment to a list in the Income Tax Act of amounts excluded from income. The supplied material does not include that Act’s surrounding provisions, so the full tax effect cannot be verified.

What it means for you#

  • Students with disabilities: If an amount is deductible for you under section 118.3 of the Income Tax Act, you are enrolled at a designated institution, and you meet any prescribed conditions, the Minister would have to pay your tuition fees to the institution. The bill does not set a dollar cap.
  • Post-secondary institutions: A designated institution would receive the tuition payment on the student’s behalf.
  • Taxpayers: The bill proposes an income-tax exclusion for these payments. It does not change the disability-related condition in section 118.3 in the text provided.
  • General public: The bill would create a tuition-payment provision within the existing student financial assistance law, not a new independent agency. It does not itself guarantee that more people will attend or complete post-secondary education.

Money#

The bill requires tuition payments but provides no cost estimate in the supplied material.

  • The federal government would pay qualifying tuition fees, subject to conditions set by regulation.
  • The bill specifies no spending limit, budget, staffing requirement, or estimate of how many students might qualify.
  • The payment would be treated as a grant to the student and proposed to be excluded from income under the Income Tax Act.

What is unclear#

  • What conditions regulations would set, and when those regulations would be made.
  • Whether the payment would cover all tuition fees or be limited by rules not included in the bill.
  • Which institutions qualify as “designated” and how the section 118.3 condition works under current law; the relevant parent Acts were not supplied for comparison.
  • How students would access the payment, when institutions would be paid, and whether there would be an appeal process. The supplied text does not set out these procedures.
  • When the proposed changes would start. The supplied material gives no commencement date or bill status.

Case for#

  • The bill appears intended to reduce a tuition barrier for students who meet its disability-related tax-law condition.
  • Paying institutions directly could connect the assistance to tuition costs, while treating it as a grant rather than a loan.
  • A regulation-making power could allow conditions to be set for when payments are made.

Case against#

  • The bill does not state a spending limit or estimate the number of eligible students, so the public cost is unknown.
  • The eligibility condition and future regulations determine who receives help, but the bill does not set out the full rules or process.
  • Without payment timelines, appeal rules, or other procedures in the supplied text, students and institutions may not know how the provision would work in practice.
Loading versions…Read this official publication

Summary matches the latest captured text

Summary version: First Reading · 2025-06-19

Last source check:

Read the latest official text

How the text changed

Loading versions…