Supplementary Appropriation Act, (Infrastructure Expenditures), No. 2, 2026-2027

Summary#

Bill 64, the Supplementary Appropriation Act (Infrastructure Expenditures), No. 2, 2026-2027, would create a supplementary spending authority for the Northwest Territories for the fiscal year ending March 31, 2027. It does not amend another Act. Its stated goal is to cover government expenses and related purposes.

  • It would authorize up to $78.333 million in additional capital investment spending from the Consolidated Revenue Fund (the government’s main public fund).
  • Of that amount, $76.477 million is assigned to Infrastructure, $1.556 million to Education, Culture and Employment, and $300,000 to Environment and Climate Change.
  • The schedule lists no additional operations spending. The amounts are authority to spend, not a requirement to spend them.
  • Spending must follow the Financial Administration Act and the purposes in the schedule. The authority expires March 31, 2027, and the bill requires the amounts spent to be reported in the Public Accounts.

What it means for you#

  • Government departments: The three named departments would have additional authority for capital investment expenditures. The bill does not identify specific projects.
  • Taxpayers and the public: The bill authorizes public spending, but does not create a new tax or fee or guarantee a direct service or benefit.
  • Public accountability: Any amount spent under this authority must be accounted for in the Public Accounts.

Money#

The bill would authorize up to $78.333 million in additional public spending; no separate cost estimate is provided.

  • Infrastructure: $76.477 million.
  • Education, Culture and Employment: $1.556 million.
  • Environment and Climate Change: $300,000.
  • No additional operations spending is listed. The bill does not say how much of the authorized capital funding will actually be spent.

What is unclear#

  • The schedule does not name the projects or purchases the money would fund.
  • It does not explain how the amounts for each department were set or how they would be divided among specific purposes.
  • The bill does not say whether the full amounts will be spent, or provide timelines for individual projects.
  • The bill is deemed to take effect from April 1, 2026, but the supplied material does not explain the reason for that date.

Case for#

  • A possible argument for the bill is that it gives government additional authority to fund capital investment during the 2026-2027 fiscal year.
  • The schedule assigns amounts to named departments, while the Public Accounts requirement provides for accounting of money spent.
  • The authority is limited by the amounts in the schedule, the stated government purposes, and the March 31, 2027 expiry date.

Case against#

  • The bill does not identify the projects, so readers cannot judge their purpose or likely benefit from the bill alone.
  • Most of the authority—$76.477 million—is assigned to Infrastructure, but the bill does not explain that allocation.
  • Because the bill authorizes spending without requiring it, the amounts do not show what will actually be spent or delivered.