Back to Bills

Guaranteed Federal Special Education Funding

Full Title:
IDEA Full Funding Act

Summary#

This bill amends the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) Part B to set mandatory federal funding amounts for special education each year from fiscal 2026 through 2035 and thereafter. It creates a schedule that raises the federal share (expressed as dollar totals or as a percentage of a calculated national “need”) gradually up to a target of 40% by fiscal year 2035 and each year after. The bill also says the new mandatory spending must follow cut-as-you-go budget rules (offsets).

  • Main change: Requires Congress to appropriate specific, mandatory amounts for IDEA Part B each year, rising on a schedule to $69,644,540,000 or 40% of the calculated amount by FY2035 and later.
  • How funding is calculated: The “amount determined” is the number of children with disabilities who received services times the national average per-pupil expenditure in public schools.
  • Schedule: The bill lists an authorized amount and an appropriated (mandatory) amount for each fiscal year 2026–2035. The appropriated amounts increase each year until they match the authorized amount in 2035 and thereafter.
  • Scope: The change applies to Part B of IDEA (school-age special education), and the text includes preschool-age children where states are eligible under the preschool grants rules.
  • Budget rule: The bill requires the increases to be handled consistent with cut-as-you-go requirements (budget offsets must be identified).

What it means for you#

  • Students with disabilities and families
    • This could mean more federal dollars nationally for special education services over time. The bill does not change who is eligible for services or the legal rights under IDEA.
  • School districts and state education agencies
    • This would likely increase the federal grant amounts they receive for IDEA Part B on a rising schedule. The bill does not change the program’s eligibility rules or most distribution formulas; it changes the total amounts appropriated.
    • This could affect local budgeting decisions because federal special education grants would be a larger share of total funding over time.
  • Early childhood programs
    • The bill’s funding calculation explicitly includes children ages 3–5 for states that receive preschool grants, so those preschool grants are reflected in the national funding target.
  • Federal budget and taxpayers
    • The bill makes part of IDEA funding mandatory spending that grows each year. The bill says those amounts must meet cut-as-you-go budget rules, which means offsets or other budget measures will be required to pay for the increases.
  • What is unclear
    • The bill does not change how federal dollars are split among states within the existing Part B formulas. It also does not say where required budget offsets would come from.

Expenses#

The bill increases mandatory federal spending for IDEA Part B on a set schedule. The appropriation lines in the bill are:

  • FY2026: Appropriated $6,425,048,000 or 4.5% of the calculated amount, whichever is greater. (Authorized level listed: $16,661,928,000 or 11.6%.)

  • FY2027: Appropriated $8,372,932,000 or 5.7% (Authorized: $19,531,844,000 or 13.4%).

  • FY2028: Appropriated $10,911,357,000 or 7.3% (Authorized: $22,896,084,000 or 15.3%).

  • FY2029: Appropriated $14,219,357,000 or 9.3% (Authorized: $26,839,795,000 or 17.6%).

  • FY2030: Appropriated $18,530,244,000 or 11.9% (Authorized: $31,462,786,000 or 20.2%).

  • FY2031: Appropriated $24,148,064,000 or 15.2% (Authorized: $36,882,058,000 or 23.1%).

  • FY2032: Appropriated $31,469,041,000 or 19.3% (Authorized: $43,234,768,000 or 26.5%).

  • FY2033: Appropriated $41,009,521,000 or 24.6% (Authorized: $50,681,693,000 or 30.4%).

  • FY2034: Appropriated $53,442,392,000 or 31.4% (Authorized: $59,411,305,000 or 34.9%).

  • FY2035 and each subsequent year: Appropriated $69,644,540,000 or 40.0% (Authorized: same).

  • Budget offsets: Section 3 requires the increased mandatory appropriations to comply with cut-as-you-go rules (that is, the added mandatory spending must be offset under applicable budget rules).

  • No fiscal estimate provided in the bill text. There is no accompanying fiscal note or explanation in the provided material showing total long-term costs, specific offsets, or effects on other parts of the federal budget.

Proponents' View#

  • The bill appears intended to raise the federal share of funding for special education over time, moving toward a 40% federal share of the national per-pupil cost for children with disabilities.
  • A possible argument for the bill is that setting mandatory, rising appropriations gives schools and states more predictability about federal support for special education.
  • The schedule of increases could be seen as a way to reduce the funding gap between federal support and the calculated national cost of educating children with disabilities.
  • Including preschool-age children in the funding calculation signals attention to early childhood special education needs.

Opponents' View#

  • One concern is the large increase in mandatory federal spending and the requirement that those increases be offset under cut-as-you-go rules; the bill does not say where offsets would come from.
  • The bill does not explain how the new dollars will be distributed among states beyond existing Part B formulas, so it is unclear how local districts or particular students will benefit.
  • The bill sets total funding amounts but does not change program rules, accountability, or how states must use the money; some may worry increased funding alone may not guarantee improved services.
  • It is unclear how the increase will interact with existing state and local funding requirements, such as state maintenance-of-effort rules; the bill does not address those interactions.