Vancouver to rezone for 630 rental homes

Summary#

Vancouver City Council unanimously approved in principle changes to the Vancouver Official Development Plan (ODP) and CD-1 (285) zoning for 940–950 West 41st Avenue, the Jewish Community Centre site. The stated goal is to allow a four-phase development; the approval does not yet change the zoning or guarantee the project will proceed.

  • The ODP designation would change from Mixed-Use Mid-Rise and Mixed-Use High-Rise 1 to Mixed-Use Low-Rise and Mixed-Use High-Rise 2, with the boundary between them altered.
  • The zoning amendment would raise the maximum floor space ratio (FSR, building floor area relative to site area) from 4.49 to 5.77, and the maximum height from 88 metres to 136 metres (446 feet).
  • The proposal includes two towers of 39 and 37 storeys, two six-storey buildings, and 630 market rental homes. At least 20% of the residential floor area must be secured as non-profit-operated rental housing.
  • The proposal also includes a private childcare facility, a private school, and a replacement Jewish Community Centre.
  • The approvals are conditional. A Housing Agreement by-law must be enacted before the CD-1 amendment; the ODP amendment can be enacted only if specified conditions for the CD-1 amendment are met. Council is not obliged to enact either by-law.

What it means for you#

  • People seeking rental housing: If the project proceeds, it would include 630 market rental homes. At least 20% of the residential floor area—not necessarily 20% of the homes—must be secured as non-profit-operated rental housing. The decision does not set rents or explain who would qualify.
  • People who might use the school, childcare or community centre: The proposal includes private facilities and a replacement Jewish Community Centre. The decision does not require public access or explain fees or eligibility.
  • People living near the site: The approved-in-principle zoning would allow buildings up to 136 metres and an FSR of 5.77. The decision does not itself authorize construction.
  • The property owner and applicant: They must meet the approval conditions before the City can enact the zoning change. The motion says costs incurred to meet rezoning conditions are at the property owner’s risk.
  • City residents: The decision does not create a new City service or guarantee that the project will be built. The City retains its authority and discretion.

Money#

No cost estimate is included in the available material.

  • The property owner bears the risk of costs incurred to meet rezoning conditions. City costs and the project’s construction costs are not stated.
  • The material gives no estimate of public spending, revenue, or future returns.

What is unclear#

  • What the Housing Agreement and other conditions require in detail.
  • What rents, tenant eligibility rules, or operating terms will apply to the non-profit-operated housing.
  • When the project might proceed, and whether all four phases will be built.
  • What concerns were raised in the three pieces of correspondence opposing the application. Five pieces supported it; the reasons for either position are not provided.

Case for#

  • A possible argument for the decision is that it enables 630 rental homes while securing at least 20% of residential floor area for non-profit-operated rental housing.
  • It would allow a replacement Jewish Community Centre alongside a private school and private childcare facility.
  • City staff recommended approval, though the supplied material does not give their reasons.

Case against#

  • The zoning change would permit a much taller and larger development: the maximum height would rise from 88 to 136 metres, and the maximum FSR from 4.49 to 5.77.
  • Three pieces of correspondence opposed the application, but the available material does not say why. The concerns cannot be assessed from this summary.
  • The approval in principle does not settle the final outcome: conditions must be met, and the City is not required to enact the by-laws.