Securing our Border Act

Summary#

This measure would reprogram remaining unobligated funds from the IRS enforcement account. One-third of those funds would go to U.S. Customs and Border Protection to buy and deploy nonintrusive inspection systems with the goal of 100% scanning at northern and southwest land ports of entry by February 6, 2034. Two-thirds would go to the Department of Homeland Security for activities related to construction of a border wall system along the southwest international border through the same date. The measure also authorizes hiring and retention incentives for U.S. Customs and Border Protection agents (recruitment bonuses up to $15,000; annual retention bonuses up to 15 percent of basic pay; relocation bonuses up to 15 percent of annual basic pay) and specifies those bonuses are not part of basic pay. Finally, it amends the treatment of aliens arriving from contiguous territory to require that such an alien either be returned to that territory or a safe third country pending hearings, or be detained for further asylum consideration including a credible fear determination.

What it means for you#

  • Ports of entry could see more nonintrusive scanning equipment installed aimed at scanning more passenger and commercial vehicles.
  • The southwest border could see additional border wall construction projects funded from reprogrammed funds.
  • Newly hired and current customs officers could be eligible for recruitment, retention, or relocation bonuses under set limits.
  • People arriving from contiguous territory may be returned to that territory or a safe third country while immigration proceedings continue, or be detained for asylum screening under the amended standard.

Expenses#

  • The bill directs one-third of the specified unobligated balances to nonintrusive inspection systems and two-thirds to border wall construction, with both transfers to occur between enactment and February 6, 2034.
  • The bill sets individual bonus limits (up to $15,000 recruitment; up to 15% of basic pay for annual retention and relocation) but does not give total dollar amounts or budgetary cost estimates.
  • The Secretary must provide quarterly reports that include implementation plans and cost estimates for wall construction, but the bill text does not include those cost numbers.
  • No publicly available information on the exact dollar amounts reprogrammed or the overall cost and fiscal effects beyond the allocation proportions.

Proponents' View#

The bill's findings state reasons for the actions it directs: border security is described as essential; there are concerns about illicit drugs (including fentanyl) entering through ports of entry and high overdose deaths; current nonintrusive inspection coverage at the southern border is low; seizures and encounters at the southwest border have been large; there are many deaths attempting to cross; there is a large immigration court backlog; ports need more staffing; and many southern sectors rely on outdated systems. The bill frames the proposed funding shift, new technology, wall construction, and bonuses as responses to those problems.

Opponents' View#

No publicly available information.